This week started off terribly.

The anti-Jewish massacre in Australia, the deadly shootings at Brown University and MIT.

The murders of Rob and Michelle Reiner.

Weeks like this should cause us and our leaders to do some hard thinking about violence, hatred, mental health, guns, spiritual malays, and the warping effects of technology and social media on our thinking and on our behavior.

Alternatively, if you're the president, you could just not have helpful thoughts at all, such as what happened this week One prime example, while the nation from left to right mourned the loss of one of our country's most beloved filmmakers, the president decided it was a good moment to make the murders of the Reiners about his own grievances.

Well, I wasn't a fan of his at all.

He was a deranged person as far as Trump is concerned, you know, the Russia hoax.

He was one of the people behind it.

I think he hurt himself in career wise, he became like a deranged person, Trump derangement syndrome, so I was not a fan of Rob Reiner at all in any way, shape or form.

I thought he was very bad for our country.

I'll talk about all of this with our panel.

Franklin Foer, a staff writer at The Atlantic.

Zo and Kenno Youngs is a White House correspondent for The New York Times.

Jonathan Carl is the chief Washington correspondent for ABC News and the author of Retribution Donald Trump and the Campaign That Changed America, and Ashley Parker is a staff writer at The Atlantic.

Um, so let's, let's talk first about the actual terrible events of the last week.

The suspect in the Brown University and now MIT shootings has killed himself apparently after several days of intense anxiety during a manhunt.

John, what, what broader lessons should we derive about uh from this from this incident, particularly as it relates to law enforcement and social media components.

Well, look, this was not a shining moment, to say the least, for law enforcement.

Let's remember that the the case was cracked on Reddit, uh, not, not by any investigators, local or federal, but I, I focus on the FBI here.

Kash Patel went out and said that they had caught the shooter and and he went out and posted it on social media on X. They had not caught the shooter yet.

That was not true.

Who knows if that affected the course of the investigation.

Did that cause anybody to, you know, to to to stop the search, but this was not the first time he had done exactly that.

He did this with the, the killer of Charlie Kirk.

He went out in that case and before Tyler Robinson was apprehended, said that they got the guy.

and they didn't have the guy.

So what is the director of the FBI doing?

Is he using this as an opportunity?

tragedies like this, serious cases like this to boost his Twitter followers to get more likes on social media?

What's he trying to do?

And look, are you asking that rhetorically?

I rhetorically, but, but I mean there there there's a serious broader point, which is, um, what, what is the leadership of the FBI doing right now.

I mean, we we have half of it is leaving.

Well, yeah, a bunch of it's leaving.

The other half is working on reviewing the Epstein files, and, and, uh, the FBI leadership brought largely people out of the national security division to have the task of reviewing the FBI files for for release.

So what is not being looked at, what is not being dealt with.

It's a lack of seriousness at the top of the FBI that may be really dangerous.

Frank, same type of question to you on the Sydney massacre, we've already had something like this in America in Pittsburgh, um, the squirrel Hill synagogue massacre.

Uh, how exposed is the American Jewish community to the sort of Islamist terrorism that we just saw in on the beach outside Sydney I mean I think of what's happened in Australia as kind of an object lesson of how things could be much worse than they are here for the American Jewish community.

I know this because I have cousins in Australia who are Jewish, and ever since October 7th, they could feel kind of violence and terror getting ever close to them.

They would write about how there was a firebombing at a synagogue or how there was a kosher deli that was attacked and how there were all sorts of incidents that were happening in their neighborhoods, in their communities, to their daycare centers, and their frus t ration was that they felt exposed.

They felt this kind of a Chekhov's gun type situation.

The events were all there planted, and then this was the natural culmination.

It was a natural culmination and it was hard to know exactly where it was coming from because it was coming from both activists who were participating in who were who were uh captivated by the cause of the Palestinians, but it's also coming from these global forces.

It was coming.

There was one attack that the Australians attributed to the Iranians.

There was another this recent recent attack was obviously planned and implemented by members of ISIS.

ISIS, and so I think that there's so much coming in the failure of the government to act preemptively.

I think reflects a greater pathology that we see to a much lesser extent here, right, which is OK, no, no, no, no, it's fine, but I, you just reminded me John is talking about FBI and national Security division.

There's also in the counterterrorism area.

A lot of those people in the FBI have been moved to border patrol, border enforcement deportation issues, yes, I mean, talk about that for a minute.

It seems as if we went through a long period where counterterrorism was the dominant cause of the FBI, the dominant focus of the FBI.

Now it seems like they've moved in a completely different direction.

Oh, you've had a trend throughout this year where FBI analysts, not just FBI but also DEA, have been redirected to support what is the what this administration sees as the national security priority, that being the removal of undocumented immigrants, and I've talked to Homeland Security officials, law enforce people in the law enforcement community who say that this has created gaps in the national security apparatus, and it's broad, right?

Yes, it's those FBI analysts.

It's it's criminal investigators being redirected to basically stand by and support ICE agents, but it's also homeland HSI agents that do longer term investigations into criminality.

This is broad throughout the entire national security apparatus, right?

Asher, let me ask you about the president's response to the killing of the Reiners.

Um, this is a tragedy It's a story about a brilliant filmmaker.

Everybody loves his movies, left wing, right wing, doesn't matter what you are.

Everybody loves movies.

Um, it's a story, it's a horrible story apparently about drug addiction and family in crisis.

The president's reaction was entirely about the president We've seen this before, but have we seen that this floridly I mean, and you played a clip at the beginning of the show.

It's worth noting that those comments came after he put out a post on Truth So that all but implied Rob Reiner by being a liberal democratic activist by being opposed to President Trump sort of had it coming.

Trump's initial take was Rob Reiner has been against me.

People got angry and and he and his wife were murdered.

I mean, that there was no empathy, not just a lack of empathy.

It was such a crude, almost gleeful posting on social media that you saw a cracks in Trump's coalition, which you rarely see.

You saw Republicans and not just sort of mainstream Republicans.

You saw members of MAGA who, to be fair, when Charlie Kirk had been assassinated, had said that the people celebrating this is is disgusting.

It's abhorrent, and then they see the leader of their own party doing that and some of them had the conviction to say, you know, this isn't OK.

Now, to be clear, many of them didn't, but it was striking to see people James Wood, the actor, you know, who's a very big Trump supporter who was just loved Rob Reiner, I was horrified, I think, by what Rob Rob Reiner too, it's worth noting when Charlie Kirk was assassinated.

He was one of the people who came out and said, I don't, I don't care what, you know, anyone's beliefs are.

This is an abhorrent, grotesque act that should never happen to anyone.

It reminded me of what he did after Nancy Pelosi's husband Paul was attacked with hammer.

I mean, almost killed in their home in San Francisco and you know it was the same kind of thing.

It reminded me, look back at some of the statements that Trump has made every year on Veterans Day, where he talks about the suckers and the haters and the losers and all of this and you know happy Veterans Day.

Um, so it is consistent, but this did feel like it went a step beyond, particularly coming in the context of coming after Charlie Kirk, and the, and the sense that he was justifying or saying that explaining why, which with absolutely no factual basis whatsoever.

He was dead wrong, but suggesting that Reiner's political attacks on Trump were the reason why he was murdered with a knife by his own son, right?

Zolin, I mean, one of the factors here is that his movies are very mainstream and universally.

beloved, and so people have positive associations.

What it doesn't matter what your politics are, with seeing those, those movies, but I'm wondering if there was, do you see that, I mean, you study the man closely.

A degree in like a a a degree of anger or like kind of freneticness in in his responses to the Reiner, uh, the Reiner death that that's, that was unusual because it did provoke this response in among Republicans that usually don't see.

Unusual in the sense that it was just so close to the actual tragedy, right?

It was, it was just hours after, but I do think this is part of a pattern, like times of tragedy, whether it's natural disasters.

There's usually a sense of, you know, well, that state, what are they doing for me to get this to get this aid, this federal support, whether it's a tragedy of a murder as well.

The personal grievance tends to trump empathy.

Empathy tends to get substituted for spite, uh, when it comes to this precedent.

Has he shown empathy I mean, I think there have been flashes of him showing empathy, but it's, but they're very, they're very quick and short-lived.

And and he'll sometimes show empathy, especially in natural disasters for for red states and for his people, he's much more able to communicate empathy if he feels like it's a Trump supporter who has lost their home in a hurricane or a tornado.

There was an amazing scene right on his first week in office when he went to North Carolina and showed empathy to many Trump supporters who met him at the airport there.

Later on that day he went to California, and he said, well, look, yes, this these fires just happened.

Well, I also want these immigration po lic ies put forward, and he also criticized Newsome days later.

So that difference of red to blue states, it's true.

Let's